<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>PentaxLife Topic: Tamron reviews</title>
<link>http://pentaxlife.com/forum/</link>
<description>PentaxLife Topic: Tamron reviews</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:17:30 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>netimages on "Tamron reviews"</title>
<link>http://pentaxlife.com/forum/topic/92#post-344</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>netimages</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">344@http://pentaxlife.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Found it on eBay. It took a while. It would work for concerts fine. I'm looking forward to the new Pentas lens for portraits for sure.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Marq on "Tamron reviews"</title>
<link>http://pentaxlife.com/forum/topic/92#post-343</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 13:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Marq</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">343@http://pentaxlife.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Hey netimages,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;how much did that 75-200 cost you, and where did you get it from?&lt;br /&gt;
I'm looking to get a very decent lens for concert photography, and the announced Pentax doesn't even go to 200.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Vitali on "Tamron reviews"</title>
<link>http://pentaxlife.com/forum/topic/92#post-334</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 06:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Vitali</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">334@http://pentaxlife.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;EX series Sigmas are pretty good for the price usually. But Sigma's ultrazooms are not EX, just DC. In any case, all ultrazooms are the matter of compromises between convenience and image quality.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>netimages on "Tamron reviews"</title>
<link>http://pentaxlife.com/forum/topic/92#post-332</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>netimages</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">332@http://pentaxlife.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I picked up a manual focus 75-200mm sigma f2.8 to hole me over till the new lenses are out. It's heavier than the new Pentax lenses, but lighter than my Tamron 28-75 2.8 autofocus.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'm really glad I bought it. It's has expanded my lowlight photography for sure, and I'm been happy with its sharpness. Not as good as my Pentax prime lenses, but better than my Pentax FA J 75mm-200mm f4.5 for sure!
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Marq on "Tamron reviews"</title>
<link>http://pentaxlife.com/forum/topic/92#post-331</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 05:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Marq</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">331@http://pentaxlife.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Who has been using a 2.8 up to 200 zoom with the K10D (either Tamron or Sigma) and what are your impressions?
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>KFrog on "Tamron reviews"</title>
<link>http://pentaxlife.com/forum/topic/92#post-329</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 02:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>KFrog</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">329@http://pentaxlife.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I think I'll go with the Tamron 18-200mm as my first lens when I finally get a K10D. With the release 18-250mm the 200 should be available at a good price.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Vitali on "Tamron reviews"</title>
<link>http://pentaxlife.com/forum/topic/92#post-283</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 04:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Vitali</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">283@http://pentaxlife.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Many Pentaxians (especially those who have migrated recently from ultrazoom p&amp;#38;s) think about of newest (and longest) &lt;a href=&quot;http://astore.amazon.com/penta-20/detail/B000IBMQVW/102-4773034-4044118&quot;&gt;Tamron 18-250mm F/3.5-6.3 AF Di-II LD Aspherical (IF) Macro&lt;/a&gt; ultrazoom lens.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now there is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slrgear.com/reviews/showproduct.php?product=1009&quot;&gt;review at the SLRgear.com&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;It competes against other long-zoom designs, both in the form of the original Tamron 18-200mm, as well as the Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 and the Nikon 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 VR (vibration reduction) optic. While it's clear that a $500 ultra-zoom will never compete with higher-priced, lower-ratio zooms, let alone prime lenses, we were pleasantly surprised by how well the Tamron 18-250mm stacked up against the competition.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>