<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>PentaxLife Tag: Limited</title>
<link>http://pentaxlife.com/forum/</link>
<description>PentaxLife Tag: Limited</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:36:34 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>Pentaxdc on "DA 35mm f2.8 Macro Limited"</title>
<link>http://pentaxlife.com/forum/topic/136#post-499</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 20:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Pentaxdc</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">499@http://pentaxlife.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Meuh,&lt;br /&gt;
I've checked the photos (at Flickr) you took with the 18-250mm DA Lens and they really look sharp.&lt;br /&gt;
Now ... I know why a good percentage of my shots ended up in Photoshop for immense retouching! I have been using a Sigma 28-200mm all along but I am realizing that the K10D can be as good as the lens it is matched with ... or perhaps the photographer (me!).&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for the comments and link.&lt;br /&gt;
Cheers!
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Pentaxdc on "DA 35mm f2.8 Macro Limited"</title>
<link>http://pentaxlife.com/forum/topic/136#post-497</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 01:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Pentaxdc</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">497@http://pentaxlife.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Meuh,&lt;br /&gt;
I am waiting for that new 18-250mm which should be in very soon; ordered it about 3 weeks ago.&lt;br /&gt;
Do you think this lens has acceptable optics/rendering? Just wondering if I did make agood choice.&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks,
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>meuh on "DA 35mm f2.8 Macro Limited"</title>
<link>http://pentaxlife.com/forum/topic/136#post-487</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 11:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>meuh</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">487@http://pentaxlife.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;More SDM lenses here:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/jconouaib/1525203237/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/jconouaib/1525203237/&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>meuh on "DA 35mm f2.8 Macro Limited"</title>
<link>http://pentaxlife.com/forum/topic/136#post-486</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 10:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>meuh</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">486@http://pentaxlife.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Staff on Pentax booth say me the focus ring was not usable. So not a working sample.&lt;br /&gt;
The same day I was able to test the new DA 18-250mm, see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/meuh/sets/72157602647236133/detail/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/meuh/sets/72157602647236133/detail/&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Vitali on "DA 35mm f2.8 Macro Limited"</title>
<link>http://pentaxlife.com/forum/topic/136#post-485</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 23:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Vitali</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">485@http://pentaxlife.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you, meuh. This lens looks great and I believe it will be great in IQ. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Don't you know is it a working sample or just a mock-up?
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>meuh on "DA 35mm f2.8 Macro Limited"</title>
<link>http://pentaxlife.com/forum/topic/136#post-482</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 07:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>meuh</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">482@http://pentaxlife.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I'd posted some photos of the next DA 35mm f2.8 Macro Limited&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/groups/pentaxdslrusers/discuss/72157602648355839/&quot;&gt;on flickr&lt;/a&gt;, taken during Salon de la Photo, Paris 2007.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I wasn't able to test it, since it was not completely functionnal according to Pentax staff member.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Vitali on "21mm Limited Back Focus Issue"</title>
<link>http://pentaxlife.com/forum/topic/35#post-115</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Vitali</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">115@http://pentaxlife.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Happy end of this story&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://pentaxlife.com/forum/topic/47&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://pentaxlife.com/forum/topic/47&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>benjikan on "21 Limited Replaced and Perfect..."</title>
<link>http://pentaxlife.com/forum/topic/47#post-114</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>benjikan</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">114@http://pentaxlife.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday, Pentax gave me a replacement of my 21L that I was having BF problems with. The one they gave me was the one given to &quot;Reposes Photo&quot; magazine in France to use for their review..I guess it would be perfect in that case. None the less I can now use my focal length of preference without hesitation or concern. It is Soooo sharp..I love it.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>benjikan on "Pentax 40mm Limited and 100 Macro Shots"</title>
<link>http://pentaxlife.com/forum/topic/42#post-106</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>benjikan</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">106@http://pentaxlife.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Here is a sample from my shoot this weekend done with the 40 Limited for Fashion and the Pentax 100 Macro for Still Life. It was the first time I used the K10D for Still Life. By the way the image on the left is a &quot;BULGARI&quot; Diamond Ring...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;JUST GO TO THIS LINK... &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://anashcreation.com/thenashgallery/BenjaminKanarek/Double_Small?full=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://anashcreation.com/thenashgallery/BenjaminKanarek/Double_Small?full=1&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Vitali on "21mm Limited Back Focus Issue"</title>
<link>http://pentaxlife.com/forum/topic/35#post-96</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 15:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Vitali</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">96@http://pentaxlife.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Have you tried to calibrate the focus by yourself using recently leaked service menu activation method?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hope you will share your 16-50mm impressions with us :)
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>benjikan on "21mm Limited Back Focus Issue"</title>
<link>http://pentaxlife.com/forum/topic/35#post-95</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 12:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>benjikan</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">95@http://pentaxlife.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Just got the response from Pentax via their head office in Germany.  They confirmed that there is a back focussing problem with the 21mm Limited exclusively.  They offered to set up one of my bodies to work in conjunction with the lens, which I refused.  I do not wish to take up one body exclusively for that lens.  I am waiting on a firmware fix or a chip set change for the lens.  I will use it in manual focus only.  They are sending me back the two bodies and the two lenses i.e. the 21 and the 16-45 which didn't have a problem and focussed perfectly on the &quot;0&quot; calibration point.  I will wait for the 16-50 f2.8 which I should have in ten days to use in lieu of the 21mm Limited.  If it is anything like the Canon 17-40L lens which I used on 80 percent of my magazine work, I will probably do the same with it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ben
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>