<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>PentaxLife Tag: backfocus</title>
<link>http://pentaxlife.com/forum/</link>
<description>PentaxLife Tag: backfocus</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:48:21 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>Vitali on "21mm Limited Back Focus Issue"</title>
<link>http://pentaxlife.com/forum/topic/35#post-115</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Vitali</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">115@http://pentaxlife.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Happy end of this story&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://pentaxlife.com/forum/topic/47&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://pentaxlife.com/forum/topic/47&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>benjikan on "21 Limited Replaced and Perfect..."</title>
<link>http://pentaxlife.com/forum/topic/47#post-114</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>benjikan</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">114@http://pentaxlife.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday, Pentax gave me a replacement of my 21L that I was having BF problems with. The one they gave me was the one given to &quot;Reposes Photo&quot; magazine in France to use for their review..I guess it would be perfect in that case. None the less I can now use my focal length of preference without hesitation or concern. It is Soooo sharp..I love it.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Vitali on "21mm Limited Back Focus Issue"</title>
<link>http://pentaxlife.com/forum/topic/35#post-96</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 15:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Vitali</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">96@http://pentaxlife.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Have you tried to calibrate the focus by yourself using recently leaked service menu activation method?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hope you will share your 16-50mm impressions with us :)
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>benjikan on "21mm Limited Back Focus Issue"</title>
<link>http://pentaxlife.com/forum/topic/35#post-95</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 12:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>benjikan</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">95@http://pentaxlife.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Just got the response from Pentax via their head office in Germany.  They confirmed that there is a back focussing problem with the 21mm Limited exclusively.  They offered to set up one of my bodies to work in conjunction with the lens, which I refused.  I do not wish to take up one body exclusively for that lens.  I am waiting on a firmware fix or a chip set change for the lens.  I will use it in manual focus only.  They are sending me back the two bodies and the two lenses i.e. the 21 and the 16-45 which didn't have a problem and focussed perfectly on the &quot;0&quot; calibration point.  I will wait for the 16-50 f2.8 which I should have in ten days to use in lieu of the 21mm Limited.  If it is anything like the Canon 17-40L lens which I used on 80 percent of my magazine work, I will probably do the same with it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ben
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>